Effects of Global Warming - Climategate: Man-Made Global Warming in Question After Data Manipulation Revealed

Posted by Rolf Joho on April 29th, 2010 filed in Effects of Global Warming


New Spring Collection

Climategate: Man-made Global Warming In Question After Data Manipulation Revealed

The main stream media has given almost no coverage to the Climategate scanda and much to their dismay the ‘debate’ has been reopened. Many years ago, Al Gore told us the debate was over, global warming is real and manmade. In response to the Climategate emails, he has told us that like gravity, man-made global warming is pure physics and cannot be disputed.

Liberals in congress tell us that “the deniers want to create a Siberian tree ring circus,” states Representative Ed Markey (D-Mass — chairman of the House Select Energy and Global Warming Committee). They attempt to divert focus from the details of the emails and code released from Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University (CRU) by making jokes, calling critics names and indignantly saying they won’t discuss the details of emails obtained by committing a crime.

It would seem that rather than cracking jokes and calling those asking for answers, “deniers”, Congressman Markey and other liberals in Washington are themselves in denial. These Congressmen and Senators should be the very people calling for an investigation into the possibility of wrong doing at the East Anglia CRU. They don’t hesitate to hold hearings on steroid use in Major League Baseball, or hold hearings on whether there should be a college football playoff, but when it comes to manmade global warming, it’s jokes and denials.

The leaked emails and files have raised a great many questions, but only if you are actually seeking the truth, rather than forwarding a political agenda.

A review of code files and emails shows an apparent manipulation of temperatures data, when the actual data didn’t show the temperature rise that researchers at the CRU wanted to publish. The programmer that did the work used the term “Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!” when he described the ‘fudge factor’ he used to show an increase in temperature readings that the raw data failed to show.

In other code files, this same programmer described creating fictitious temperature monitoring stations, when none existed, because when he was given the task of cleaning up the CRU database, he found that he had data that simply didn’t correspond to any
1000
monitoring station. In some cases he had temperature data that started a decade before the temperature monitoring station was built, and in other cases he had temperature readings from locations (Lat/Lon) where no temperature monitoring station existed. He recounts how he attempted to match up the temperature data to real monitoring stations whenever possible, but when it wasn’t, he just created new monitoring stations. Joking that it’s the kind of thing the CRU researchers do, so why shouldn’t he.

It’s important to understand that the East Anglia CRU is considered the gold-standard of climate research centers. It’s data and publications were the primary sources for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report, which is the bases for the Kyoto Treaty, along with the basis of the negotiations going on in Copenhagen. More important to Americans is that the EPA’s primary basis for declaring CO2 a poisonous gas that the EPA can regulate was the IPCC assessment report. The EPA is now strong arming Congress, stating if a cap and trade bill is not passed, the EPA will implement punitive regulations on US corporations that will be far more stringent than contained in the House cap and trade bill.

If manipulation of data (that the EPA ultimately relied on in their ruling to regulate CO2 output) wasn’t bad enough, the CRU Climategate emails also show that Michael Mann (Penn State), Phil Jones, the head of the East Anglia Climate Research Unit, and others worked to keep all research from researchers that didn’t support man-made global warming out of peer reviewed journals. Phil Jones stated that he would be contacting the Climate Research journal and stating he would no longer have anything to do with the journal until they ‘rid themselves’ of the ‘troublesome’ editor that was publishing studies that didn’t support man-made global warming or that brought into question the concept of unprecedented global warming, regardless of the cause.

Congressman Markey and other liberals in Washington keep stating that the emails don’t change the scientific fact that the earth is warming and man is the cause. They keep recounting versions of Al Gore’s “the debate is over on global warming” line, and are not even open to alternative viewpoints and research.

If the liberals in Congress were really concerned about the truth, rather than focused on furthering their political agendas, they would be the leader in calling for independent reviews of the data that Congress, the IPCC and EPA have relied upon. If there is any chance the data is suspect, whether due to intentional manipulation, or if it is incomplete due to suppression of opposing views, then how can Congress KNOW that their conclusions and subsequent legislation are in the best interest of America.

Congresses job is not to defend questionable ethics by the VERY scientists that Congress relied on when writing and passing global warming legislation, but instead their job is to get it right.

By: John Halberg

Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com

John Halberg writes articles on politics and current events for conservative blogs and news sites, including Liberal Whoppers.

You can read more about Climategate and the East Anglia CRU emails at Liberal Whoppers Climategate page.

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Commentary Articles Via RSS!
Additional Articles From – Home | Politics | Commentary

Poland In Mourning Over The Death Of Lech Kaczynski
Infantophobia and Homophobia – Reality vs. Perception
Why Thousands of Fathers Are Fighting a Restraining Order This Year
Do Prisoners deserve better protection?
A New Approach To Fix What Ails America
WARNING: Don’t be FOOLED!
The Hard Work of Becoming a One Term President
Squeezing Money Out of a Thermometer
Governing The Planet
Is legal aid free?
India As a Nation
In Which House Do You Want to be Screwed?
Hope for Homeowners Program
Some introductory economics for the armchair economist
Race: Inside Business, Political, Report Review Scandal TV Scams, and the Myth of Color of a Preside

Ok so you might find the next few links interesting. These are from around the web, just random snippets that I’ve picked up in my reading, but I found some very cool information in them. You might too. Here goes…

Public opinion turning against global warming almost as quickly as …

A conceive free this period by the University of bureau Climate Change Research Centre confirms not exclusive that we've had worsened droughts, but this Big Dry is not caused by “global warming,” whether man-made or not. …

Global Warming – Climate Change Distortions

The Copenhagen Climate Summit on global warming was a disaster in the making. Anthropogenic or man-made global warming is still hotly disputed. Many believe there is a small amount of anthropogenic warming but not enough to enact life altering regulations. … Recent Posts. Global Warming – Climate Change Distortions · Do you think people in warmer climate moves slower than the ones living in colder climate? What harmful effects does a highway have on the environment? …

Global Warming…..What will save us? Could it be….? | Bulk Email …

liberty???? Only free-market economy can solve Global Warming. Not THE GOVERNMENT. They can't even protect us from terrorists with box cutter. Liberty and.

Hope you enjoy the read as much as I did and please if you have something to say, use the comments form below to let everyone know your thoughts.

Have a great day!

New Spring Collection


Related Blogs

Related Reading:

Global Warming: Understanding the ForecastGlobal Warming: Understanding the ForecastArcher's Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast 2nd Edition, is the first real text to present the science and policy surrounding climate change at the right level. Accompanying videos, simulations and instructional support makes it easier to build a syllabus to improve and create new material on climate change. Archer's polished writing style makes the text entertaining while the improved pedagogy helps better understand key concepts, ideas and terms.

This edition has been revised and reformulated with a new chapter template of short chapter introductions, study questions at the end, and critical thinking puzzlers throughout. Also a new asset for the BCS was created that will give ideas for assignments and topics for essays and other projects. Furthermore, a number of interactive models have been built to help understand the science and systems behind the processes.

Global Warming and Greenhouse Effect Lab ActivityGlobal Warming and Greenhouse Effect Lab ActivityGlobal Warming and Greenhouse Effect Lab Activity - Students study the causes of global warming, investigate the effect of different surfaces on heat absorption and greenhouse gases, and examine carbon dioxide absorption of infrared radiation as compared to air. -- Armed with insight gained from these activities, they are challenged to come up with possible ways to reduce the greenhouse effect on our planet. -- Includes materials for five student groups and study guides. Requires support stand and clamp lamp, available separately.
Nasco - Global Warming: Effects BookTakes a critical and scientific look at global warming and what can be done to reduce it. Helps students separate fact from fiction in popular accounts in order to make informed decisions about products and lifestyle choices that affect the Earth. Written using simplified language and vocabulary that is easier for students to understand. Reading passages, comprehension questions, hands-on activities, and six overhead transparencies are all provided. 60 pages. Grades 5-8.
Global Warming: Understanding the ForecastGlobal Warming: Understanding the ForecastGlobal Warming: Understanding the Forecast is a comprehensive introduction to all aspects of global warming. Written in an accessible style, this important book examines the processes of climate change and climate stability, from the distant past to the distant future.

Examining the greenhouse effect, the carbon cycle, and what the future may hold for global climate, this text draws on a wide range of disciplines, and summarizes not only scientific evidence, but also economic and policy issues, related to global warming. A companion web site at (http://understandingtheforecast.org) provides access to interactive computer models of the physics and chemistry behind the global warming forecast, which can be used to support suggested student projects included at the end of each chapter. Solutions and artwork from the book are available to instructors at www.blackwellpublishing.com/archer.

Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast provides an essential introduction to this vital issue for both students and general readers, with or without a science background.

Global Warming & the Greenhouse EffectGlobal Warming & the Greenhouse EffectStudents explore this crucial topic in a wide variety of formats, from hands-on science activities and experiments to a simulation game, analysis of articles, a story about an island threatened by rising sea levels, and a world conference on global warming. The unit helps students see environmental problems from different points of view. Extensive background for the teacher is provided.
Tags:

Leave a Comment

CAPTCHA Image
*