Solar Energy It Is Popular. So Why Is It Not Yet Widely Used?

Posted by Larry Wood on April 26th, 2010 filed in Global Warming


The fact is, the 350,000,000 terawatts of power obtainable from the sun is so huge that an exposure to a full sun in only 15 minutes is going to be sufficient to generate the world’s power requirement

Compare that with energy that’s generated by nuclear and fossil fuel. Presently, the available data for fossil and nuclear fuel is 10,800,000 terawatts which we all realize to be non renewable.

To create electricity, utility companies burn fossil fuels that translate to 1.3 pounds of carbon dioxide to create 1kw of electrical energy. This unwanted CO2 emissions are dumped into the atmosphere. This then translates into each typical home being accountable yearly for 22,000 pounds of CO2 emissions.

The harnessing of the sun’s rays is clean and safe. It produces no emissions and it is practical and may in the years ahead, prove very economical. Within the United States, only 0.1% of power that is generated is solar energy driven. As a result what are the obstacles?

According to the Wall Street Journal (in an article that was released in its August 2008 concern), there are groups, backed by political groups that are lobbying against the putting up of transmission lines for solar power. The construction of distribution lines for solar energy is also becoming blocked by environmental activists that restrict the delivering of solar energy to those who want it in their houses.

An additional obstacle is that the power grid within the United States which was created more than 100 many years ago is now so congested in many regions. To deliver the pv power to consumers, scientists and engineers will need to come out with an additional cost efficient plan to transfer large amounts of power from one location to another.

Solar panels are taken into consideration expensive. Even though a house increases its value by folds when pv powered, the costs nevertheless could be prohibitive to most that unless the non silicon flexible pv panels that are now being produced are released for market consumption, powering houses through solar energy could still be very limited.

Other forms of rewards to prevent fossil fuel use should still be effectively placed. The 30% tax cut to projected cost previously awarded will be a lot more attractive if other federal credits are included to encourage further investments.

The global warming issue that has been brought to the papers is really a recurrent subject of talk shows and remains to become a great news item. Also, the too unstable pump prices, should and for most part, already be a good incentive to use this option source of energy.

Nevertheless, effective solar energy transmission to homes will stay to be very hard unless these obstacles are breached. Assuming that these obstacles are solved these days, it will still take some many years to convert 20% of American homes into solar energy users. Meanwhile, solar panels on individual houses remain to be the most viable option.

The great part to solar energy quest is that technologies is advancing very rapidly. Nano technology for solar power is becoming developed and may be available in five many years time. Other breakthroughs in cell designs are also being produced that could, in the next few years, be a cost-effective way of generating power without having to rely anymore on fossil and nuclear energy.

Lastly, you got to check out the Energy Saving method that save the earth and my bill too. I didn’t know that I can make my own solar panel that only costs me less than one thousand dollar.


Related Blogs

Ecological Debt: Global Warming and the Wealth of Nations
  
Tags: , ,

Leave a Comment

CAPTCHA Image
*